Kim Wever, researcher of the department of Health Evidence and an international team published the article 'Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of preclinical systematic reviews' in PLoS Biology.
In an effort to better utilize published evidence obtained from animal experiments, systematic reviews of preclinical studies are increasingly more common—along with the methods and tools to appraise them (e.g., SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation [SYRCLE’s] risk of bias tool). We performed a cross-sectional study of a sample of recent preclinical systematic reviews (2015–2018) and examined a range of epidemiological characteristics and used a 46-item checklist to assess reporting details. We identified 442 reviews published across 43 countries in 23 different disease domains that used 26 animal species. Reporting of key details to ensure transparency and reproducibility was inconsistent across reviews and within article sections. Items were most completely reported in the title, introduction, and results sections of the reviews, while least reported in the methods and discussion sections. Less than half of reviews reported that a risk of bias assessment for internal and external validity was undertaken, and none reported methods for evaluating
construct validity. Our results demonstrate that a considerable number of preclinical systematic reviews investigating diverse topics have been conducted; however, their quality of reporting is inconsistent. Our study provides the justification and evidence to inform the development of guidelines for conducting and reporting preclinical systematic reviews.
Read the full article in PLoS Biology here .
Related news items
Differences in the number of de novo mutations between individuals due to small family-specific effects and stochasticity28 July 2021
Christian Gilissen and colleagues investigated whether there is a family-specific contribution to the number of de novo mutations in the DNA of offspring and published the results in the Genome Research.read more
Christa Sperna Weiland, Erwin van Geenen and Joost Drenth discuss the best strategy to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis28 July 2021
Christa Sperna Weiland, Erwin van Geenen and Joost Drenth, published in Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the most efficacious prophylaxis strategy to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.read more
ZonMw Gender in Research competition awarded to Genderful Research World Consortium27 July 2021
Natalia Valdrighi and Esmeralda Blaney Davidson won the competition to create a plan for the dissemination of the knowledge and skills gained during the Gender in Research workshop amongst their peers, colleagues and institution, financed by ZonMw and CIHR-IGH in Canada.read more
Young people with colorectal cancer deserve their own treatment27 July 2021
Richarda de Voer and Marjolijn Ligtenberg's study on clinical, pathological, genetic and molecular characteristics of colorectal tumors in adolescents and adults 25 years of age or younger is published in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.read more
Nijmegen literally puts Digital Health on the map Flourishing ecosystem gets its own interactive overview22 July 2021
Digital Health is thriving in the Nijmegen region, where it contributes to better care and health and also creates jobs. To bring developers and end users even closer together, The Economic Board and the Radboudumc are introducing the Interactive Digital Health map.read more