In Breast Cancer Research Nico Karssemeijer, Ritse Mann and colleagues of the theme Women's cancers, presented a study in which they found that less breast cancers are detected when breasts are compressed too firm in mammography.
AbstractIn mammography, breast compression is applied to reduce the thickness of the breast. While it is widely accepted that firm breast compression is needed to ensure acceptable image quality, guidelines remain vague about how much compression should be applied during mammogram acquisition. A quantitative parameter indicating the desirable amount of compression is not available. Consequently, little is known about the relationship between the amount of breast compression and breast cancer detectability. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of breast compression pressure in mammography on breast cancer screening outcomes.
MethodsWe used digital image analysis methods to determine breast volume, percent dense volume, and pressure from 132,776 examinations of 57,179 women participating in the Dutch population-based biennial breast cancer screening program. Pressure was estimated by dividing the compression force by the area of the contact surface between breast and compression paddle. The data was subdivided into quintiles of pressure and the number of screen-detected cancers, interval cancers, false positives, and true negatives were determined for each group. Generalized estimating equations were used to account for correlation between examinations of the same woman and for the effect of breast density and volume when estimating sensitivity, specificity, and other performance measures. Sensitivity was computed using interval cancers occurring between two screening rounds and using interval cancers within 12 months after screening. Pair-wise testing for significant differences was performed.
ResultsPercent dense volume increased with increasing pressure, while breast volume decreased. Sensitivity in quintiles with increasing pressure was 82.0%, 77.1%, 79.8%, 71.1%, and 70.8%. Sensitivity based on interval cancers within 12 months was significantly lower in the highest pressure quintile compared to the third (84.3% vs 93.9%, p = 0.034). Specificity was lower in the lowest pressure quintile (98.0%) compared to the second, third, and fourth group (98.5%, p < 0.005). Specificity of the fifth quintile was 98.4%.
Results suggest that if too much pressure is applied during mammography this may reduce sensitivity. In contrast, if pressure is low this may decrease specificity.
|Influence of breast compression pressure on the performance of population-based mammography screening.|
|Holland K, Sechopoulos I, Mann RM, den Heeten GJ, van Gils CH, Karssemeijer N.|
This research was conducted within the theme Women's cancers
Related news items
Working energetically from home3 December 2020
By now, you may have gotten used to it: working from home. The page ‘Working energetically from home‘ offers you tips to help you work from home better, from setting up a good workspace to working more effectively and maintaining a good work-life balance.read more
Controlled Human Malaria Infection Induces Long-Term Functional Changes in Monocytes3 December 2020
Robert Sauerwein and Henk Stunnenberg together with Mihai Netea and other colleagues now show for the first time that even a parasitic infection can train the immune system. The article is published in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.read more
Brainy blog Donders Wonders wins prize for science communication3 December 2020
Donders Wonders, the Donders Institute’s science blog, has won the Communication Award of the NWO Domain Science (ENW). The jury praised the bloggers for the impact and reach of the articles they write and called the way the blog is organised ‘an inspiration’.read more
Radboudumc research most lungs recover well after COVID-1926 November 2020
In severe COVID-19 patients the lung tissue recovers well in most cases. This is shown in research by the Radboudumc, published in Clinical Infectious Diseases. Striking conclusion: patients who were referred by the general practitioner recover worse than ICU patients.read more
Marianne Boenink has been appointed professor in Ethics of Healthcare26 November 2020
Health scientist and philosopher Marianne Boenink has been appointed professor in Ethics of Healthcare at the Radboud University/ Radboudumc, as of 1 August 2020.read more