NL
DE
28 February 2019
Imaging (X-ray, CT and MRI) provides no health benefits for low back pain (LBP) patients and is not recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Whether imaging leads to increased costs, healthcare utilization or absence from work is unclear. Therefore, this study systematically reviews if imaging in patients with LBP leads to an increase in these outcomes.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science until October 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs), comparing imaging versus no imaging on targeted outcomes. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of the body of evidence was determined using GRADE methodology.
Results:
Moderate-quality evidence (1 RCT; n = 421) supports that direct costs increase for patients undergoing X-ray. Low-quality evidence (3 OSs; n = 9535) supports that early MRI may lead to an increase in costs. There is moderate-quality evidence (1 RCT, 2 OSs; n = 3897) that performing MRI or imaging (MRI or CT) is associated with an increase in healthcare utilization (e.g., future injections, surgery, medication, etc.). There is low-quality evidence (5 OSs; n = 15,493) that performing X-ray or MRI is associated with an increase in healthcare utilization. Moderate-quality evidence (2 RCTs; n = 667) showed no significant differences between X-ray or MRI groups compared with non-imaging groups on absence from work. However, low-quality evidence (2 Oss; n = 7765) did show significantly greater mean absence from work in the MRI groups in comparison with the non-imaging groups.
Conclusions:
Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs, increased healthcare utilization and more absence from work.
Publication
Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare utilization and absence from work
G. P. G. Lemmers, W. van Lankveld, G. P. Westert, P. J. van der Wees, J. B. Staal
Link to Springer
Gijs Lemmers, Wim van Lankveld, Gert Westert, Philip van der Wees and Bart Staal are members of theme Healthcare improvement science.
In the European Spine Journal Gijs Lemmers, Wim van Lankveld, Gert Westert, Philip van der Wees and Bart Staal showed that imaging in low back pain may be associated with higher medical costs, increased healthcare utilization and more absence from work.
Abstract
Purpose:Imaging (X-ray, CT and MRI) provides no health benefits for low back pain (LBP) patients and is not recommended in clinical practice guidelines. Whether imaging leads to increased costs, healthcare utilization or absence from work is unclear. Therefore, this study systematically reviews if imaging in patients with LBP leads to an increase in these outcomes.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science until October 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (OSs), comparing imaging versus no imaging on targeted outcomes. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of the body of evidence was determined using GRADE methodology.
Results:
Moderate-quality evidence (1 RCT; n = 421) supports that direct costs increase for patients undergoing X-ray. Low-quality evidence (3 OSs; n = 9535) supports that early MRI may lead to an increase in costs. There is moderate-quality evidence (1 RCT, 2 OSs; n = 3897) that performing MRI or imaging (MRI or CT) is associated with an increase in healthcare utilization (e.g., future injections, surgery, medication, etc.). There is low-quality evidence (5 OSs; n = 15,493) that performing X-ray or MRI is associated with an increase in healthcare utilization. Moderate-quality evidence (2 RCTs; n = 667) showed no significant differences between X-ray or MRI groups compared with non-imaging groups on absence from work. However, low-quality evidence (2 Oss; n = 7765) did show significantly greater mean absence from work in the MRI groups in comparison with the non-imaging groups.
Conclusions:
Imaging in LBP may be associated with higher medical costs, increased healthcare utilization and more absence from work.
Publication
Imaging versus no imaging for low back pain: a systematic review, measuring costs, healthcare utilization and absence from work
G. P. G. Lemmers, W. van Lankveld, G. P. Westert, P. J. van der Wees, J. B. Staal
Link to Springer
Gijs Lemmers, Wim van Lankveld, Gert Westert, Philip van der Wees and Bart Staal are members of theme Healthcare improvement science.
Related news items
Research into treatment for bladder pain syndrome will now be reimbursed
4 August 2021 Bladder pain syndrome, also called interstitial cystitis, is a chronic benign condition of the urinary bladder read more
Obesity increases risk of death in uterine cancer PhD defense of Hannah Donkers on 22 April
22 April 2021 Research by Hannah Donkers shows that obesity causes a worse survival rate in women with uterine cancer. In addition, it appears that lower socioeconomic class and anemia also contribute. read more
Physiotherapy is important to the recovery of patients with the coronavirus
26 March 2020 Patients who have been infected with the coronavirus and admitted to the hospital for this reason should receive physiotherapy as soon as their condition allows. This is the view expressed by physiotherapists and researchers from the Radboudumc in a set of joint treatment recommendations. read more
Healthcare utilization and regional variation of end-of-life hospital care in Dutch cancer patients
26 March 2020 In International Journal of Quality Health Care RIHS researcher Femke Atsma showed high healthcare utilization and medical variation in End of Life care in Cancer patients, which was not associated with GP care or long term care. read more
