3 February 2020

Leon Bijlmakers and colleagues show that Citizens who are given the opportunity to reflect and interact with each other become more modest and sympathetic to health care rationing decisions. The citizen forum identified 16 criteria that participants considered relevant and acceptable for making tough choices in health care reimbursement. These criteria and the underlying values could inform Health Technology Assessment frameworks and the process of national level decision making about the benefits package of basic health insurance.

Abstract

Background
Some studies in the Netherlands have gauged public views on principles for healthcare priority setting, but they fall short of comprehensively explaining the public disapproval of several recent reimbursement decisions.

Objective
To obtain insight into citizens' preferences and identify the criteria they would propose for decisions pertaining to the benefits package of basic health insurance.

Methods
Twenty-four Dutch citizens were selected for participation in a Citizen Forum, which involved 3 weekends. Deliberations took place in small groups and in plenary, guided by 2 moderators, on the basis of 8 preselected case studies, which participants later compared and prioritized under the premise that not all treatments can or need to be reimbursed. Participants received opportunities to inform themselves through written brochures and live interactions with 3 experts.

Results
The Citizen Forum identified 16 criteria for inclusion or exclusion of treatments in the benefits package; they relate to the condition (2 criteria), treatment (11 criteria), and individual characteristics of those affected by the condition (3 criteria). In most case studies, it was a combination of criteria that determined whether or not participants favored inclusion of the treatment under consideration in the benefits package. Participants differed in their opinion about the relative importance of criteria, and they had difficulty in operationalizing and trading off criteria to provide a recommendation.

Conclusions
Informed citizens are prepared to make and, to a certain extent, capable of making reasoned choices about the reimbursement of health services. They realize that choices are both necessary and possible. Broad public support and understanding for making tough choices regarding the benefits package of basic health insurance is not automatic: it requires an investment.

Publication
Increasing the Legitimacy of Tough Choices in Healthcare Reimbursement: Approach and Results of a Citizen Forum in The Netherlands.
Bijlmakers L, Jansen M, Boer B, van Dijk W, Groenewoud S, Zwaap J, Helderman JK, van Exel J, Baltussen R.



 

Related news items


Ritalin enhances your ability to do tasks by making you more motivated

26 March 2020

A new study uncovers how stimulants like Ritalin work in the brain, and it challenges some misconceptions for its recreative use. The collaboration between Radboudumc and Brown University (USA) was published in the journal Science.

read more

Dealing with COVID-19 in low- and middle-income countries

26 March 2020

RIHS researcher Joost Hopman believes that low-and middle-income countries should intensify their preparedness for a possible COVID-19 outbreak. This was the core message of an opinion article that he wrote at the request of the medical journal JAMA.

read more

Physiotherapy is important to the recovery of patients with the coronavirus

26 March 2020

Patients who have been infected with the coronavirus and admitted to the hospital for this reason should receive physiotherapy as soon as their condition allows. This is the view expressed by physiotherapists and researchers from the Radboudumc in a set of joint treatment recommendations.

read more

Healthcare utilization and regional variation of end-of-life hospital care in Dutch cancer patients

26 March 2020

In International Journal of Quality Health Care RIHS researcher Femke Atsma showed high healthcare utilization and medical variation in End of Life care in Cancer patients, which was not associated with GP care or long term care.

read more

Study into better protection for healthcare workers against coronavirus infection

19 March 2020

Radboudumc and UMC Utrecht will investigate whether health care workers are better protected against the coronavirus after a vaccination against tuberculosis (BCG vaccine). This vaccine does not directly protect against the coronavirus, but provides a boost to the immune system.

read more

Differences in the placental disposition of TNF inhibitors uncovered

19 March 2020

In Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, researchers from the Depts. of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Health Evidence, in collaboration with Sanquin Diagnostic Services, investigated the placental handling of the TNF inhibitors infliximab and etanercept.

read more