7 February 2019

In National Comprehensive Cancer Network Lydia van Overveld and Rosella Hermens described the quality of current integrated head and neck cancer care using evidence-based quality indicators, the variation between Dutch hospitals, and the influence of patient and hospital characteristics.

Monitoring and effectively improving oncologic integrated care requires dashboard information based on quality registrations. The dashboard includes evidence-based quality indicators (QIs) that measure quality of care. This study aimed to assess the quality of current integrated head and neck cancer care with QIs, the variation between Dutch hospitals, and the influence of patient and hospital characteristics.

Previously, 39 QIs were developed with input from medical specialists, allied health professionals, and patients' perspectives. QI scores were calculated with data from 1,667 curatively treated patients in 8 hospitals. QIs with a sample size of >400 patients were included to calculate reliable QI scores. We used multilevel analysis to explain the variation.

Current care varied from 29% for the QI about a case manager being present to discuss the treatment plan to 100% for the QI about the availability of a treatment plan. Variation between hospitals was small for the QI about patients discussed in multidisciplinary team meetings (adherence: 95%, range 88%-98%), but large for the QI about malnutrition screening (adherence: 50%, range 2%-100%). Higher QI scores were associated with lower performance status, advanced tumor stage, and tumor in the oral cavity or oropharynx at the patient level, and with more curatively treated patients (volume) at hospital level.

Although the quality registration was only recently launched, it already visualizes hospital variation in current care. Four determinants were found to be influential: tumor stage, performance status, tumor site, and volume. More data are needed to assure stable results for use in quality improvement.

Variation in Integrated Head and Neck Cancer Care: Impact of Patient and Hospital Characteristics.
van Overveld LFJ, Takes RP, Braspenning JCC, de Jong RJB, de Boer JP, Brouns JJA, Bun RJ, Dik EA, van Dijk BAC, van Es RJJ, Hoebers FJP, Kolenaar B, Kropveld A, Langeveld TPM, Verschuur HP, de Visscher JGAM, van Weert S, Witjes MJH, Smeele LE, Merkx MAW, Hermens RPMG.

Lydia van Overveld and Rosella Hermens are both members of theme Women's cancers.

Related news items

Rosella Hermens appointed professor of Person-centered oncological integrated care

7 April 2022 Rosella Hermens has been appointed Professor of Person-centered oncological integrated care at Radboud university medical center/Radboud University. She investigates how care for patients with cancer can become more person-centered and better organized, while the patient remains in control. read more

Ioannis Sechopoulos receives NWO Vici grant for research on improving breast cancer diagnostics

1 March 2022 Ioannis Sechopoulos will conduct research into improving tomosynthesis, an X-ray examination that radiologists use to detect breast cancer. read more

1.4 million euro to reduce hospital admissions due to medication

7 January 2022 A team of sixteen Dutch hospitals received a grant of 1.4 million euros from ZonMw. They will investigate whether they can reduce medication related hospital readmissions. read more

Mireille Broeders appointed member of the Dutch Health Council

16 November 2021 Mireille Broeders, professor of Personalized Cancer Screening, has been appointed as a member of the permanent Committee on Population Screening of the Dutch Health Council (Gezondheidsraad). read more

Research into treatment for bladder pain syndrome will now be reimbursed

4 August 2021 Bladder pain syndrome, also called interstitial cystitis, is a chronic benign condition of the urinary bladder read more

Report of the 12th New Frontiers symposium Better care, network care? - 2 November 2018

7 November 2018 No easy answers at this symposium last Friday, only challenges that can be overcome if we succeed in 5 things. First and most radically, put patients in the center of healthcare. Second, start with assessing what the local population needs and not what local professionals have to offer. read more