11 November 2021

Radboud university medical center, Radboud University and 13 other organisations involved in animal testing in the Netherlands have signed the Dutch Transparency Agreement on Animal Testing. The institutes commit themselves to communicate in a more open way about how animals are used in research.

The group of signatories consists of universities, university medical centres, scientific institutes, companies, and associations.

The signatories are: Amsterdam UMC, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Charles River Laboratories Den Bosch B.V., Envigo RMS B.V., Erasmus University Medical Center, Leiden University, Maastricht University, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Radboudumc, Radboud University, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, University of Groningen, Vereniging Sportvisserij Nederland, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Wageningen University & Research.

Transparency

The importance of good and transparent communication about animal research is becoming increasingly recognised. This agreement was drafted by various Dutch researchers in collaboration with the European Animal Research Association (EARA) and Stichting Informatie Dierproeven (SID) and is inspired by existing transparency agreements from Belgium, France, Germany, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom.

The aim is to create a more open and transparent climate around animal research, a subject that usually leads to heated discussions in society, the media and politics. As animal testing is such a sensitive topic, it is essential to provide context to communicate the benefits of using animal models. Dutch research institutes already share a lot of information and data about their animal research, but that information is not always easily accessible for the public. The signatories hope that this transparency agreement will make a positive contribution towards creating more openness and informed discussion about animal testing.

Four commitments

The signatories are involved in carrying out, supporting or funding animal experiments for the benefit of human and animal health, quality of life and nature and the environment. By signing, the organisations make the following four commitments:

  1. We are clear about when, how and why we use animals in research.
  2. We will enhance our communication with the media and the public about our involvement in animal research in the Netherlands.
  3. We will be proactive in providing opportunities for the public to inform themselves about research using animals and the regulations that govern it.
  4. We will report on our progress annually and share our experiences.

“This is a big step forward for the biomedical sector in the Netherlands,” said EARA executive director Kirk Leech. “It has been shown that transparency agreements in other European countries have led to a much more informed and evidence-based debate in society on the use of animals in research.”

Monique Havermans, neuroscientist and EARA’s representative: “The debate in the Netherlands is fierce, even though most people seem to have the same opinion on the topic; replace animal experiments wherever possible. We need context, accurate information from those performing animal experiments and acknowledgement from those whose work and accomplishments has been built on animal research.”

Wilbert Frieling, chair of SID adds: “With the kick-off of the Transparency Agreement, we hope to see more parties join the initiative in the future, making it easier to talk about animal research in the Netherlands.”

Judith Homberg, professor, concludes: “Collaboration between universities and companies on high-tech methods can lead to the refinement and reduction in animal testing, as we will pitch today at the Holland High-Tech meeting. The transparency agreement offers us opportunities to inform the public on such new developments”.

The summary of the agreement can be downloaded here (link to external webpage).

Related news items


Playing games to control emotions How cognitively demanding tasks can affect emotion regulation

19 April 2022

Cognitive reappraisal can help us to control our emotions. It involves recognizing negative thought patterns, and gradually changing them to more effective patterns. A new study shows how the cognitive load of reappraisal, rather than the reappraisal itself, affects our emotional processing.

read more

The effects of dopamine levels on reward responsivity

25 November 2021

To adapt to the ever-changing context in which we live, we are constantly deciding how much effort to put into performing our behavior, or how fast to perform our actions. How do people decide how fast to act and how does the brain compute this? Our researchers set out to investigate this.

read more

Adverse effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in bipolar disorder

18 November 2021

Mindfulness is often described as “being aware of our present moment experience, in a friendly and non-judgmental way”. As research into mindfulness, and psychotherapy in general, has mainly been focused on positive outcomes, not much is known about the possibility of adverse effects.

read more

Why we are curious about 'useless' information A neurocognitive explanation

13 October 2021

In our daily lives, we are exposed to an overload of information. We found ourselves to be curious about both 'useful' information such as weather forecasts, and 'useless' information such as the infinite content on social media. A new study provides us a cognitive explanation to such curiosity.

read more