To adapt to the ever-changing context in which we live, we are constantly deciding how much effort to put into performing our behavior, or how fast to perform our actions. How do people decide how fast to act and how does the brain compute this?
Our behavior is often based on how much reward (money, food, etc.) someone expects to earn by successfully completing an action. An influential neuroscientific theory states that the average reward someone can earn by completing an action is encoded in the brain by the neurotransmitter dopamine, and that higher levels of dopamine then make people act faster. This theory therefore poses the question whether people whose brains are able to produce more dopamine would indeed be more sensitive to changes in how much reward they can earn for a given task, and in which brain area this dopamine production is particularly important.
The current researchers set out to investigate the hypothesis that people act faster when they earn a high reward for a task than when they would earn a low reward and they expected that this effect would be stronger for people who produce more dopamine in a part of the brain that is important for reward processing, called the nucleus accumbens. The research group, led by Roshan Cools, from the Department of Psychiatry and the Donders Institute, published their results in Psychopharmacology on November 4th.
They used PET imaging to measure how much dopamine human participants produce after which they played a computer task in which they could earn more money during some periods and less money during other periods. It was indeed found that people with high dopamine production in the nucleus accumbens speed up in periods of high reward compared with periods of low reward, whereas this was not the case for people with low dopamine production.
These results give more insight into why some people change their behavior more upon changes in reward than other people, and which brain area is particularly important for this effect.
Hofmans L, Westbrook A, van den Bosch R, Booij J, Verkes R-J, Cools R. Effects of average reward rate on vigor as a function of individual variation in striatal dopamine. Psychopharmacology (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-06017-0
Related news items
Playing games to control emotions How cognitively demanding tasks can affect emotion regulation19 April 2022
Cognitive reappraisal can help us to control our emotions. It involves recognizing negative thought patterns, and gradually changing them to more effective patterns. A new study shows how the cognitive load of reappraisal, rather than the reappraisal itself, affects our emotional processing.read more
Adverse effects of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in bipolar disorder18 November 2021
Mindfulness is often described as “being aware of our present moment experience, in a friendly and non-judgmental way”. As research into mindfulness, and psychotherapy in general, has mainly been focused on positive outcomes, not much is known about the possibility of adverse effects.read more
Dutch institutions sign agreement about their research using animals11 November 2021
Radboudumc, Radboud University and 13 other organisations involved in animal testing in the Netherlands have signed the Dutch Transparency Agreement on Animal Testing. The institutes commit themselves to communicate in a more open way about how animals are used in research.read more
Why we are curious about 'useless' information A neurocognitive explanation13 October 2021
In our daily lives, we are exposed to an overload of information. We found ourselves to be curious about both 'useful' information such as weather forecasts, and 'useless' information such as the infinite content on social media. A new study provides us a cognitive explanation to such curiosity.read more