In 2019 funding will be made available for 6 RIHS Junior Researcher projects. The call for these PhD grants is now open.
Criteria for application
- The first applicant is a RIHS affiliated (junior)PI or a researcher within a RIHS affiliated (junior)PI group (PI predicate per January 1, 2018).
- The work of the PhD has to be done primarily within that (j)PI group
- Only one project per (j)PI group can be submitted.
- The project should be new, not previously awarded by nor currently under review by another grant agency.
- The theme leader should confirm that the project fits and strengthens the focus of the theme
- Applicants (i.e. PI group) who received a project in the Junior researcher round 2018 are not eligible for this round.
- The project should result in a PhD graduation within Radboudumc.
Conditional on sufficient quality, relevance, feasibility and fit within a research theme, project proposals will be prioritized in the following order:
- A proposal that was evaluated externally since January 1, 2017 and received excellent reviews but was not granted (such as a VENI proposal). Attach documents such as the reviews, rebuttal and decision letter.
- A proposal that develops new methodology for the population sciences (such as a new measurement technique, a new research design or a new analysis tool).
- A proposal that creates a new collaboration with an international partner (the PhD should spend at least 6 months at the partner’s institute).
- The RIHS Grant Review Committee will assess the pre-proposals on the aspects: 1. suitability of the project for a junior researcher; 2. innovative content; 3. scientific or societal relevance.
- A maximum of 10-15 projects will be selected by the Grant Review Committee for submission of a full proposal.
- The full proposals will be assessed by the RIHS Grant Review Committee for 1. suitability of the project for a junior researcher; 2. innovative content; 3. scientific quality; 4. preliminary results; 5. scientific or societal relevance; 6. collaboration.
- An opportunity for a concise rebuttal to the review will be provided.
- The Grant Review Committee will come to an advice based on the review and the rebuttal.
- The Committee’s advice will be handed to the scientific director for prioritization and final decision.
|Submission of pre-proposals (*)||14 May 2018|
|Decision pre-proposals to applicant||6 June 2018|
|Submission of full proposals (*)||9 July 2018, 11h|
|Pre-advice to applicant||30 August 2018|
|Rebuttal by applicant (*)||10 September 2018, 11h|
|Final decision to applicant||End of September 2018|
Want to know more about these subjects? Click on the buttons below for more news.
Related news items
A personal touch of Maroeska te Loo15 October 2019
In order to promote interaction amongst colleagues within RIMLS, we have a ‘personal touch’ series setting employees in the spotlight. A light-hearted manner to learn about the colleagues you know and those you don’t. This week: Maroeska te Loo.read more
KWF Roadshow 11 November 201910 October 2019
In which way(s) can KWF provide optimal support to oncological research and care? How can we maximize impact on our investments? These questions are pivotal in Ambition 2030: the vision that KWF developed in close cooperation with stakeholders in the oncological field.read more
More than 3000 visitors at Open Day RIHS10 October 2019
On Sunday 6 October RIHS organized an Open Day in the Weekend of Science (“Weekend van de Wetenschap”) with special guest and television presenter Klaas van Kruistum. More than 3000 visitors became a health scientist for one day and discovered how special healthcare research is.read more
‘Smart shirt’ can accurately measure breathing and could be used to monitor lung disease3 October 2019
Denise Mannée and colleagues are developing Hexoskin, a smart shirt that can measure breathing in people. It can reliably measure breathing in healthy people while carrying out activities. This means they can now test out the smart shirts with patients who have COPD.read more
A coordinated analysis on the association of sedentary behaviour and cognitive function1 October 2019
In Sports Medicine Carlijn Maasakkers and colleagues present the results from a coordinated analysis in 5 cohorts on the association between total sitting time and global cognition. As no clear associations were found, they hypothesize that specific types of sitting differentially affect cognition.read more