In 2020 funding will be made available for 6 RIHS Junior Researcher projects. The call for these PhD grants is now open.
Criteria for application
- The first applicant is a RIHS affiliated (junior)PI or a researcher within a RIHS affiliated (junior)PI group (PI predicate per January 1, 2019).
- The work of the PhD has to be done primarily within that (j)PI group.
- Only one project per (j)PI group can be submitted.
- The project should be not previously awarded nor currently under review by another grant agency.
- The theme leader should confirm that the project fits and strengthens the focus of the theme.
- Applicants (i.e. PI group) who received a project in the Junior researcher round 2019 are not eligible for this round.
- The project should result in a PhD graduation within Radboudumc.
Conditional on sufficient quality, relevance, feasibility and fit within a research theme, project proposals will be prioritized in the following order:
- A proposal that was evaluated externally since January 1, 2018 and received excellent reviews but was not granted (such as a VENI proposal). Attach documents such as the original proposal, reviews, rebuttal and decision letter.
- A proposal that develops and/or optimizes new methodology for the health sciences (such as a new measurement technique, a new research design or a new analysis tool).
- A proposal that creates a new collaboration outside Radboudumc, within Radboud University (including other faculties) or with an international partner (the PhD should spend at least 6 months at the partner’s institute).
- The RIHS Grant Review Committee will assess the pre-proposals on the aspects: 1. suitability of the project for a junior researcher; 2. innovative content; 3. scientific or societal relevance.
- A maximum of 10-15 projects will be selected by the Grant Review Committee for submission of a full proposal.
- The full proposals will be assessed by the RIHS Grant Review Committee for 1. suitability of the project for a junior researcher; 2. innovative content; 3. scientific quality; 4. preliminary results; 5. scientific or societal relevance; 6. collaboration.
- An opportunity for a concise rebuttal to the review will be provided.
- The Grant Review Committee will come to an advice based on the review and the rebuttal.
- The Committee’s advice will be handed to the scientific director for prioritization and final decision.
|Submission of pre-proposals (*)||17 May 2019|
|Decision pre-proposals to applicant||13 June 2019|
|Submission of full proposals (*)||12 July 2019, 11h|
|Pre-advice to applicant||2 September 2019|
|Rebuttal by applicant (*)||13 September 2019, 11h|
|Final decision to applicant||End of September 2019|
More information click here
Want to know more about these subjects? Click on the buttons below for more news.
Related news items
Nijmegen literally puts Digital Health on the map Flourishing ecosystem gets its own interactive overview22 July 2021
Digital Health is thriving in the Nijmegen region, where it contributes to better care and health and also creates jobs. To bring developers and end users even closer together, The Economic Board and the Radboudumc are introducing the Interactive Digital Health map.read more
Launch of UNITE4TB partnership marks a new era in Tuberculosis treatment development15 July 2021
The partnership will accelerate the development of new Tuberculosis (TB) drug regimens as part of the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), a public-private European Research & Development Consortiumread more
Henk Schers appointed professor of Regional Network Formation of General Practice14 July 2021
His research focuses on innovations in the collaboration between healthcare providers from inside and outside the hospitalread more