My name is Jeroen Creemers and I am currently working as a clinical PhD candidate in the Computational Immunology group at the Department of Tumor Immunology, theme Cancer development and immune defense.
When you were a kid what did you want to be when you grew up? Can you tell us something about your child years.
I was born and raised in Nijmegen and was very active as a child: I liked to play outside in nature, did a lot of sports (judo and swimming) and liked music. As a kid I had many future aspirations: I wanted to live in the tropical rain forests as an explorer, but I also wanted to become a doctor (especially in sports medicine) and an architect. I am glad that I ended up in medicine, which has allowed me to combine a fascination for complex patho-/physiological processes with contact with patients.
What was your previous academic training, where did you study and why that study?
First, I studied Medical Biology at the Faculty of Science of the Radboud University. It was a really interesting bachelor program which provided an excellent overview of fundamental biological principles. In particular the alterations in signal transduction pathways that lead to unrestrained proliferation of cells during carcinogenesis fascinated me. Although interesting, I noticed that I would like to do more than research alone: I wanted to apply knowledge and encounter complex pathophysiological problems in practice. Therefore, I finished the bachelor program and switched to the master program Medicine at the Radboudumc. My preference for oncology remained and because I would like to combine clinical care for patients with research, I started as a PhD candidate at the Department of Tumor Immunology.
The RIMLS motto is: ‘Today’s molecules for tomorrow’s medicine’. What does this mean for you?
I think that it describes the pursuit of unravelling the molecular and thereby mechanistic basis of disease to find new therapeutic options for patients.
Who is your great example as scientists? And please give a motivation why.
There are so many great scientists, that I cannot pick just one of them! Already in ancient times there were brilliant minds with great ideas (e.g. Hippocrates), but also more recently we have known giants who have transformed academia. Some great examples in my view are Darwin and Wallace with their ideas on evolution, Watson, Crick and Franklin who unravelled the DNA structure and Kaplan, Meier and Cox who contributed to the current analysis and representation of time-to-event data as published in nearly all clinical studies today.
The similarity between these minds might originate from the fact that they were able to ‘think outside of the box’ and show perseverance during times when others were sceptical.
Which research discovery that you have made has made you most proud?
The topics that I am currently working on, studying the consequences of conventional clinical trial design in immuno-oncology and implementing new mechanism-based methods to improve clinical trial design, make me proud. The clinical trial industry is a multi-billion dollar industry with (sadly) in terms of patient benefit more setbacks than breakthroughs. Being able to contribute to this field and pursuing an improvement for patients with cancer in these (research) settings provides a great motivation.
Given unlimited finance what experiment would you perform?
Given unlimited finance I would dream bigger than a single experiment! In that case, I would like to set up a state-of-the-art clinical research unit focussing on oncology in which clinicians work alongside fundamental biomedical scientists and data scientists to improve cancer care. The primary focus would be on the translational implementation of fundamental biomedical knowledge in patient care and mechanism-based/data-driven optimisation of clinical trials.
What does your working area (desk, office) look like and what does it say about you (or your research)?
I share an office with several colleagues on the 5th floor facing the Nijmegen city center. My desk is (often) clean and organized in order to focus as optimal as possible and reduce potential distractions.
Nominate a colleague to be in the spotlight and what would you like to ask him or her?
I would like to nominate Shabaz Sultan, a fellow PhD candidate in our group with a totally different background (informatics/computational modelling). What are the prerequisites for an optimal collaboration between clinicians and data/computer scientists to work together productively and what can both fields learn from one another?
What type of person are you, quick insights:a) Mac or PC? : Both have their strengths and weaknesses
b) Theater or cinema? : Cinema
c) Dine out or dine in? : Dine out
d) Ferrari or Fiat? : Lamborghini
e) Shopaholic or chocoholic? : Shopaholic
f) Culture or Nature : Nature
Related news items
Bart van de Warrenburg appointed visiting professor at the UKM Medical Centre in Kuala Lumpur11 November 2019
Neurologist and Principal Investigator at the Donders Institute Bart van de Warrenburg has been appointed visiting professor at the UKM Medical Centre in Kuala Lumpur.read more
3D breast ultrasound elastography to improve breast cancer detection5 November 2019
One out of seven women will be diagnosed with breast cancer during their life. Early detection of breast cancer is important to increase the survival rate. Gijs Hendriks graduated recently on a new technique, 3D elastography, to detect breast cancer better.read more
Self-management rehabilitation program improves participation in patients with neuromuscular disease4 November 2019
Yvonne Veenhuizen, Alexander Geurts theme Neurorehabilitation, Baziel van Engelen, theme Disorders of movement, and colleagues, showed that Energetic improves participation in patients with neuromuscular disease. They have published their results in Neurology.read more