A video consultation is often about the benefits of a digital connection. But what does it mean for the conversation itself? Surgeon Martijn Stommel and his sister Wyke Stommel (assistant professor of Language and Communication, Radboud University) conducted research into specific parts of the conversations, including: the opening.
In this article, we explore potential extra interactional work conducted by participants in video-mediated consultations. We focus on the beginning of the consultation. Our data consist of 39 recorded, postoperative, oncological consultations, both face-to-face and through video-mediated communication (VMC), which we analyzed using conversation analysis. Our analysis revealed small but important interactional and relational efforts that physicians employ to enable mediated health care. While in both video and face-to-face settings, the opening was usually followed by an announcement of the pathology report, we identified an alternative pattern of arriving at the reason for the consultation. Physicians may insert the question ‘how are you?’ (HAY?), being both pro-social and eliciting a patient report of the post-surgical state, in openings of medical consultations. The inserted HAY? was much more common in video consultations than in face-to-face consultations, suggesting that the other-attentiveness conveyed with the question was increasingly important in the video-setting. In response to HAY?, patients produced hedged responses, projecting the relevance of an elaboration of their initial answer. However, surgeons unilaterally closed the self-report with optimistic formulations or assessments in order to move on to the pathology results as the first and main reason for the consultation. This was a disaffiliative move, paradoxical to the prior pro-social HAY?. This indicates that inserting a particular move in a video consultation may pose consequences for the organization of rest of the consultation. It also shows that a detailed analysis can reveal aspects of mediated communication that remain under the surface when relying on contrived data (interviews, surveys).
Martijn Stommel is member of theme tumors of the digestive tract.
Related news items
Vierdaagse (Four Days Marches) 2020 call for projects24 February 2020
Researchers pay attention! The Dutch Research Council (NWO) is looking for researchers to contribute to its outreach festival Expeditie Next, which will have an area at the Four Days Marches party (Vierdaagsefeesten).read more
Dutch Brain Foundation grant for EENnacoma20 February 2020
Lavrijsen and Van Erp: ‘This grant will facilitate practice-based research, professionalization and further academization of EENnacoma, and links between different health care and research institutions all for the benefit of people with prolonged disorders of consciousness and their families.'read more
RIHS Awards Ceremony five winners19 February 2020
On 18 February the RIHS 'Koek & Zopie' event took place. In front of an audience of more than 125 colleagues, RIHS awardees accepted their awards for the best PhD thesis, the research product with the highest impact on society, the best peer-reviewed publication and the Supervisor of the year 2019.read more
Preserved specific force in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy19 February 2020
DCMN researcher Saskia Lassche et al., theme Disorders of Movement, recently showed in Neurology that remaining muscle fibers in Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) patients have normal muscle strength, even in severely affected muscles.read more